<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Original Content Vs Syndicated Content For Inbound Search Marketing &#8211; Hare And The Tortoise Remake</title>
	<atom:link href="http://buzzfactory.net/buzzfactory-blog/original-content-vs-syndicated-content-for-inbound-search-marketing-hare-and-the-tortoise-remake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://buzzfactory.net/buzzfactory-blog/original-content-vs-syndicated-content-for-inbound-search-marketing-hare-and-the-tortoise-remake/</link>
	<description>The Social Media And Content Marketing Company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:34:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Sequeira</title>
		<link>http://buzzfactory.net/buzzfactory-blog/original-content-vs-syndicated-content-for-inbound-search-marketing-hare-and-the-tortoise-remake/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Sequeira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 06:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzfactory.net/?p=249#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Thanks Billie ..it sure is!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Billie ..it sure is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billie Ginther</title>
		<link>http://buzzfactory.net/buzzfactory-blog/original-content-vs-syndicated-content-for-inbound-search-marketing-hare-and-the-tortoise-remake/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Billie Ginther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 05:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzfactory.net/?p=249#comment-138</guid>
		<description>Good article Neil, you made some good points. Quality content is king!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article Neil, you made some good points. Quality content is king!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Sequeira</title>
		<link>http://buzzfactory.net/buzzfactory-blog/original-content-vs-syndicated-content-for-inbound-search-marketing-hare-and-the-tortoise-remake/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Sequeira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzfactory.net/?p=249#comment-137</guid>
		<description>Absolutely Mitch! Original quality content is the path to quality search traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely Mitch! Original quality content is the path to quality search traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch Speers</title>
		<link>http://buzzfactory.net/buzzfactory-blog/original-content-vs-syndicated-content-for-inbound-search-marketing-hare-and-the-tortoise-remake/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch Speers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzfactory.net/?p=249#comment-136</guid>
		<description>Good points all.  I would add a couple thoughts.  Pure aggregation is a non-starter for a media startup looking to bootstrap their brand.  Even well-curated content is not enough.  We started down the aggregation road and quickly discovered that original, quality content was our key differentiator.  Now we are very focused on producing relevant, actionable original content, because that&#039;s what&#039;s generating QUALITY search traffic and repeat visitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points all.  I would add a couple thoughts.  Pure aggregation is a non-starter for a media startup looking to bootstrap their brand.  Even well-curated content is not enough.  We started down the aggregation road and quickly discovered that original, quality content was our key differentiator.  Now we are very focused on producing relevant, actionable original content, because that&#8217;s what&#8217;s generating QUALITY search traffic and repeat visitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Original Content Vs Syndicated Content For Inbound Search Marketing – Hare And The Tortoise Remake » BuzzFactory - Online Visibility Solutions – Content Marketing – Social Media Marketing -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://buzzfactory.net/buzzfactory-blog/original-content-vs-syndicated-content-for-inbound-search-marketing-hare-and-the-tortoise-remake/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Original Content Vs Syndicated Content For Inbound Search Marketing – Hare And The Tortoise Remake » BuzzFactory - Online Visibility Solutions – Content Marketing – Social Media Marketing -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzfactory.net/?p=249#comment-134</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Neil Sequeira and Neil Sequeira, Neil Sequeira. Neil Sequeira said: Original #Content Vs Syndicated Content For #Inbound Search Marketing – Hare And The Tortoise Remake - http://bit.ly/2nllHK [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Neil Sequeira and Neil Sequeira, Neil Sequeira. Neil Sequeira said: Original #Content Vs Syndicated Content For #Inbound Search Marketing – Hare And The Tortoise Remake &#8211; <a href="http://bit.ly/2nllHK" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/2nllHK</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

